We know what makes a successful project and we know what advice to give our own students so they are best equipped to get the top marks. We always receive positive feedback from moderators and our marking has never been adjusted.
“The marks were considered to be in line with the national standard. Full credit to the centre for a professional performance with the first attempt at a new specification.” (Craig’s moderator feedback)
“The centre have appreciated the requirements and are able to apply them realistically” (Dave’s moderator feedback)
We hope these comments give you confidence in the support we offer.
This zip file contains:
- Candidate 1 – (62 out of 70) – Additional comments.pdf
- Candidate 1 – (62 out of 70) – Mark Grid.pdf
- Candidate 1 – (62 out of 70) – Project writeup.pdf
- Candidate 2 – (61 out of 70) – Additional comments.pdf
- Candidate 2 – (61 out of 70) – Mark Grid.pdf
- Candidate 2 – (61 out of 70) – Project writeup.pdf
- Candidate 3 – (68 out of 70) – Additional comments.pdf
- Candidate 3 – (68 out of 70) – Mark Grid.pdf
- Candidate 3 – (68 out of 70) – Project writeup.pdf
