Back

Why September nerves can be a good thing.

21 August 2026

For many teachers, the final week of the summer holiday brings a mixture of excitement and apprehension. Results day has passed, new ideas are ready to be implemented, and a fresh academic year is waiting just around the corner. Yet even experienced teachers often feel a sense of nervousness as September approaches.

That feeling can be surprising. After all, if you have taught for years, led departments or mentored trainee teachers, surely you should feel completely confident by now. The reality is very different. Many teachers still wonder whether they have forgotten their rhythm in the classroom or whether their carefully planned lessons will work as intended.

Rather than seeing those nerves as a weakness, it may be more helpful to view them as evidence that you care. Teachers who want to do well are naturally concerned about getting the year off to a strong start. The goal is not to eliminate those feelings completely. Instead, it is to put systems in place that reduce avoidable stress and create a sense of control.

Start with the year, not the lessons

Many teachers spend part of the summer preparing resources and refining lesson materials. While lesson planning is important, it is often the practical demands of the school year that create the greatest pressure.

A useful starting point is to review the school calendar and identify the events that will matter to you. Parents’ evenings, assessment windows, data collection deadlines, mock examinations and school trips all have the potential to create workload spikes later in the term. One question can help guide your preparation: what will cause me stress in six weeks if I ignore it now?

Adding important dates to your diary at the beginning of the year provides a much clearer picture of what lies ahead. Teachers who stay on top of workload rarely possess a secret productivity trick. More often, they simply know what is coming before it arrives.

Think of it as laying railway tracks before the train starts moving. Once term begins, events come quickly and relentlessly. Planning ahead makes it much easier to stay in control.

Create one system and trust it

Organisation looks different for every teacher. Some prefer a paper planner. Others rely on digital calendars and spreadsheets. The specific tool matters less than having a system that you use consistently.

Maintaining your own personal planning system rather than relying entirely on multiple school platforms can reduce confusion and save time. Many experienced teachers keep their timetable, class lists, assessment records and key reminders in one place.

Colour coding can be particularly effective. Assigning colours to classes and using those same colours throughout your timetable, planner and mark book makes it easier to identify classes quickly and avoids mistaking one class for another in the same year group.

The same principle applies to student information. Having one personal mark book that contains all the information you use regularly creates a single point of reference. Instead of searching through several different systems, everything you need is immediately available.

The best organisational systems are often the simplest. If a system becomes complicated or time-consuming to maintain, it quickly becomes another problem rather than a solution. Craig and Dave both favour a spreadsheet, with one colour-coded worksheet for each class. Entering student names by hand can help you learn them more quickly at the start of the year. It is also worth adding any relevant student data but remember that pupils can surprise you. Use data to support your planning, not to create a self-fulfilling prophecy about what a student can or cannot achieve.

Protect planning time from administration

Few things disappear faster than a free period. A teacher might sit down intending to plan lessons, only to spend the entire time answering emails. One message becomes three. Three become ten. By the end of the period, no preparation has been completed.

Planning time works best when it is treated as protected time rather than spare time. Lesson preparation, curriculum planning and assessment tasks should take priority over administrative distractions whenever possible.

That does not mean ignoring emails altogether. It simply means handling them deliberately. Many experienced teachers find it more effective to process emails at specific points during the day rather than checking them constantly.

Teaching is already a profession driven by deadlines. Allowing every incoming message to dictate how you spend your time only adds to the pressure.

Establish routines from day one

The opening weeks of term often determine how much effort will be needed for behaviour management later in the year.

Clear routines provide structure for both teachers and students. Entry routines, seating plans, equipment checks, homework procedures and lesson endings all benefit from consistency.

Students rarely remember expectations simply because they were explained once. They need reminders, repetition and reinforcement. If a routine feels slow or awkward at first, resist the temptation to abandon it. Consistency is what makes routines effective.

This is especially important for ECTs. It can be tempting to focus on creative activities and exciting lesson ideas, but routines provide the foundation that allows those activities to succeed.

Students generally respond well when expectations are predictable. They know where the boundaries are, understand what is expected of them and can focus more effectively on learning.

Let consistency beat creativity

Teachers are naturally creative people. Summer often provides time to rethink schemes of learning, redesign lessons and experiment with new approaches. While that creativity is valuable, the first few weeks of term are not always the best time to prioritise it.

A highly consistent classroom is usually more effective in September than a highly creative one. Students benefit from familiar structures and predictable expectations. Once those habits become established, creative activities often have a greater impact because they take place within a well-managed environment.

This does not mean lessons should be dull. It simply means that consistency should come first. A powerful principle for the start of the academic year is this: consistency beats creativity in the opening weeks.

Mark strategically, not endlessly

Workload discussions often return to marking, and with good reason. Marking can quickly become one of the biggest sources of stress for teachers.

The temptation is to treat every piece of work as equally important. Unfortunately, that approach often leads to growing backlogs and increasing pressure.

Strategic marking is far more sustainable. Focus detailed marking on work that genuinely requires it. Use verbal and whole-class feedback whenever they can achieve the same outcome more efficiently.

Students need feedback. They need recognition when they produce strong work. They need guidance when they make mistakes. However, that does not always require lengthy written comments.

The most effective feedback is often immediate and personal. A short conversation during a lesson can have far more impact than a paragraph written in an exercise book days later.

The goal is not to mark more. The goal is to help students improve while maintaining a manageable workload.

Remember that everyone feels it

Perhaps the most reassuring lesson from experienced teachers is that nervousness never completely disappears.

Teachers at every stage of their career can feel uncertain before a new academic year begins. ECTs worry about teaching independently for the first time. Experienced teachers wonder whether they still have what it takes. Department leaders think about results, staffing and curriculum changes.

Those feelings are normal.

The difference is that experienced teachers learn to channel their nervous energy into preparation. They build systems, organise their workload and establish routines before students arrive.

The Scout motto offers a simple reminder that remains as relevant to teaching as ever: Be prepared.

You survived last year. With the right preparation, there is every reason to believe you will thrive this year too.

Want to know more? Watch our latest video on ‘At the chalk face’ where we both talk about our individual experience as teachers and returning to school after the summer break.

Looking for resources to help make the new academic year easier? Explore our Craig’n’Dave Resource Centre for ready-to-use Computer Science teaching resources, or use Smart Revise to support effective revision and reduce workload.

Related posts

Ofsted after the Big Listen: have the rules changed, or just the packaging?

Ofsted has changed its inspection framework, but many school leaders question whether it has changed the culture surrounding inspection. We explore whether report cards can rebuild trust, reduce pressure and create an accountability system that genuinely helps schools improve.

9 October 2026

Should I make my own resources?

Should teachers really be making all their own resources? We explore the balance between creating, buying and adapting resources — and why thoughtful planning matters more than who made them.

5 October 2026

How does age verification technology work?

Can technology really tell how old you are? Explore the computer science behind age verification and the privacy and accuracy questions it raises.

28 September 2026

UTF-8 is witchcraft, right?

Ever wondered how your computer can happily store a simple English letter, an emoji, a pound sign and characters from […]

22 September 2026

Why teaching models keep returning

Teaching frameworks can provide valuable guidance, but when they become rigid formulas, they can undermine professional judgement. The goal isn’t identical lessons – it’s consistently effective teaching.

18 September 2026

Do GCSEs doom students to fail?

GCSE results may look stubbornly flat, but the reality behind the numbers tells a very different story. Why has further improvement become so difficult, and are we measuring success in the right way?

11 September 2026

Will Quantum Computers Break Encryption?

Could quantum computers really break encryption and put our data at risk? We explore the reality behind the hype, from qubits and Shor’s Algorithm to the future of post-quantum security.

7 September 2026

Is AI a panacea?

AI is moving from experimentation to expectation in schools. But as adoption grows, the focus must shift from simply using AI to using it well. Discover how schools can balance workload, learning, safety and professional judgement — without losing the human element of great teaching.

4 September 2026

Digital ID cards: The future of work or a privacy nightmare?

Are digital ID cards the future of convenience or a threat to privacy? Explore the benefits, risks, and debate behind the UK’s proposed digital ID system.

31 August 2026

Back

Four revision techniques that actually work

8 July 2026

The goal of revision is simple: retrieve knowledge efficiently while avoiding cognitive overload. The habits below help students revise in a way that strengthens long‑term memory rather than wasting time on ineffective strategies.

✅ DO: effective revision habits

  • Start revision early.
  • Work in 20–30-minute focused blocks with 5‑minute breaks.
  • Stop after 3–4 blocks to avoid fatigue.
  • Use each block for one specific retrieval‑based task from the four techniques below.
  • Use the four techniques across many sessions.
  • Mark your own work using official mark schemes.
  • Find a quiet, distraction‑free space.

❌ DO NOT: common ineffective practices

  • Do not reread notes, knowledge organisers, or revision guides.
  • Do not highlight or underline notes.
  • Do not rely only on multiple‑choice questions.
  • Do not cram.
  • Do not revise a single topic for long periods.
  • Do not multitask (music with lyrics, messaging apps etc).
  • Do not rely on AI marking.

 

Four revision techniques that actually work

1. Self‑testing with Cornell notes (active recall through reconstruction)

Students should use the Cornell notes created during learning to drive retrieval practice.

How to do it:

  1. Cover the main notes so only student‑generated questions and 8 key words remain visible.
  2. Use the key words as prompts to reconstruct the full notes from memory.
  3. Use the questions to check for depth and completeness.
  4. Uncover the original notes and compare:
    • Identify gaps.
    • Note missing steps.
    • Improve explanations for next time.
  5. Repeat this activity in a later revision block to strengthen the memory.

Why it works:

This is active recall, which significantly outperforms passive review methods. Reconstructing notes from prompts strengthens memory, improves metacognition, and provides clear insight into what still needs practice.

If students did not use the Cornell method during their course, they can use text books, Craig’n’Dave videos, knowledge organisers or revision guides as their reference material to make notes first.

 

2. Brain dumps with spider diagrams/mind maps

Use this to vary retrieval practice and avoid duplicating the Cornell notes process.

How to do it:

  1. Place the topic title in the centre of a blank page.
  2. From memory, create branches for all ideas, terms, diagrams, processes, and examples.
  3. Compare with class notes, textbooks, knowledge organisers or revision guides.
  4. Add missing content in a different colour.
  5. The missing branches form a priority list for the next revision cycle.

Why it works:

This technique uses visual, non‑linear retrieval to organise knowledge and reveal gaps. It’s low‑stakes, promotes metacognition, and strengthens recall.

 

3. Key‑term review using Smart Revise “Terms” Mode (Leitner System)

Flashcard practice works when spaced and retrieval‑based. Smart Revise automates this.

How to do it:

  • Use Smart Revise → Terms mode to practise vocabulary and definitions.
  • Initial flipping is passive; once confident, switch to interactive mode to write definitions.
  • The built‑in Leitner system increases practice of weaker terms and reduces repetition of mastered ones.
  • Review a small number of Terms every day, ensuring spacing.

Why it works:

Spaced retrieval is one of the most reliable ways to build long‑term retention. The Leitner system ensures time is focused on weaker areas, making revision more efficient.

If students don’t have Smart Revise they could be supplied with flashcards. Be wary of students making their own cards because they may miss some concepts, write incorrect definitions or misconceptions.

 

4. Practice papers under exam conditions + Smart Revise “Advance” mode

Past papers are essential but limited. Smart Revise adds extra high‑quality questions.

How to do it:

  • Sit timed papers with no notes and no assistance.
  • When past papers run out or you need variety, use Smart Revise Advance mode or Tasks to generate exam‑style questions.
  • Always self‑mark or use Smart Revise peer marking using mark schemes. Do not use any AI marking options for revision. It is too unreliable.

Why it works:

Exam‑condition practice improves retrieval fluency, timing, and confidence. Marking answers with real mark schemes deepens understanding of criteria and strengthens memory through deliberate error‑correction, something AI marking cannot replicate reliably.

 

How to Use Revision Guides and Knowledge Organisers

Treat revision guides and knowledge organisers as reference tools, not revision techniques.
Use them to:

  • Check whether a brain dump covered everything.
  • Check whether notes are good enough for self‑testing.

They are supporting resources, not methods.

 

Should Revision Be Fun?

Effective revision is meant to be cognitively demanding. Enjoyable, game‑like activities often feel productive but reduce the desirable difficulties needed for durable learning.

Fun has a place during initial learning, but revision works best when it involves effortful retrieval, not entertainment. Making the activity memorable can sometimes overshadow the knowledge itself.

The most effective revision techniques are rarely the most entertaining, but they consistently produce better long‑term results.

 

Want to know more? Check out our ‘At the chalk face’ episode on YouTube.

Related posts

Ofsted after the Big Listen: have the rules changed, or just the packaging?

Ofsted has changed its inspection framework, but many school leaders question whether it has changed the culture surrounding inspection. We explore whether report cards can rebuild trust, reduce pressure and create an accountability system that genuinely helps schools improve.

9 October 2026

Should I make my own resources?

Should teachers really be making all their own resources? We explore the balance between creating, buying and adapting resources — and why thoughtful planning matters more than who made them.

5 October 2026

How does age verification technology work?

Can technology really tell how old you are? Explore the computer science behind age verification and the privacy and accuracy questions it raises.

28 September 2026

UTF-8 is witchcraft, right?

Ever wondered how your computer can happily store a simple English letter, an emoji, a pound sign and characters from […]

22 September 2026

Why teaching models keep returning

Teaching frameworks can provide valuable guidance, but when they become rigid formulas, they can undermine professional judgement. The goal isn’t identical lessons – it’s consistently effective teaching.

18 September 2026

Do GCSEs doom students to fail?

GCSE results may look stubbornly flat, but the reality behind the numbers tells a very different story. Why has further improvement become so difficult, and are we measuring success in the right way?

11 September 2026

Will Quantum Computers Break Encryption?

Could quantum computers really break encryption and put our data at risk? We explore the reality behind the hype, from qubits and Shor’s Algorithm to the future of post-quantum security.

7 September 2026

Is AI a panacea?

AI is moving from experimentation to expectation in schools. But as adoption grows, the focus must shift from simply using AI to using it well. Discover how schools can balance workload, learning, safety and professional judgement — without losing the human element of great teaching.

4 September 2026

Digital ID cards: The future of work or a privacy nightmare?

Are digital ID cards the future of convenience or a threat to privacy? Explore the benefits, risks, and debate behind the UK’s proposed digital ID system.

31 August 2026

Back

The Year 7 dip: why enthusiasm fades – and how to rebuild it

7 July 2026

Every secondary teacher knows the feeling. A Year 7 class arrives in September full of enthusiasm — hands up, eyes forward, eager to please. Fast forward a few months, and the same class can feel markedly different: quieter, less responsive, occasionally resistant.

Writing in TES, David Thomas, CEO of Axiom Maths, describes this familiar experience. His research suggests that, by the summer of Year 7, students are significantly less likely to enjoy Maths than they were in Year 6. What is striking is not just that this happens, but how quickly — and how unevenly.

Yet as many classroom teachers will recognise, this pattern is not confined to Maths. It can affect Computing too, albeit playing out on a slightly different timeline.

When the shine wears off

Thomas identifies the spring term, between Christmas and Easter as the critical point where engagement drops most sharply. With multiple lessons a week, Maths provides fertile ground for this decline to emerge quickly.

In Computing, Craig and Dave suggest the change is often delayed. With fewer curriculum hours, students tend to sustain their enthusiasm through Year 7. But the dip still comes.

Year sevens are generally keen all year, but it’s when they come back in Year 8 that you really notice the shift. They’re more comfortable in the school and more complacent about learning.

This is a useful reminder, the issue is not tied to a specific term, but to a broader transition. As students settle into secondary school, the initial novelty fades and deeper challenges begin to surface.

The balancing act teachers know too well

One of Thomas’s key findings centres on the tension between repetition and pace. Teachers must reconcile wildly different starting points, often reteaching content to establish a common foundation.

In principle, this is sound pedagogy. In practice, it can be deeply frustrating for students with some thinking, “We’ve already done this — why are we still here?” Others are completely bamboozled and trying to keep up.

In Computing, this disparity can feel even more pronounced. Pupils arrive with highly variable experiences — from those who have explored coding in depth to those who have barely used a keyboard. The result is a classroom where boredom and anxiety coexist.

The danger lies in assuming that this tension is unavoidable. While it may not be fully solvable, thoughtful planning, adaptive tasks, extension pathways, low-threshold/high-ceiling activities can mitigate its impact.

 

Confidence: the slow erosion

If the mismatch of difficulty is the spark, then loss of confidence is the slow-burning fire. Thomas’s research highlights a growing confidence gap — one that emerges before any clear attainment gap. Teachers see this every day, though often in subtle ways. In Year 7, when you pose a question to the class, it’s “me, me, me” — hands shooting up. By Year 8, some students just… stop. They don’t want to put themselves out there anymore.

What changes is not just academic confidence, but social awareness. Participation becomes risky. It is no longer about impressing the teacher, but about fitting in with peers.

This creates a difficult tension. The very behaviours that support learning — asking questions, making mistakes, persevering — are precisely those that can feel socially uncomfortable. Left unchecked, this quiet withdrawal becomes self-reinforcing. The more you think students don’t want to engage, the less you push it, and the less you push it, the less they do. It becomes a downward spiral.

Classroom climate: more than behaviour management

Thomas also identifies a decline in classroom climate — reduced collaboration, less effective listening, and increased disruption. This is not simply a behaviour issue, but a cultural one. Being “too cool for school” changes everything.

Once that shift takes hold, even well-planned lessons struggle to land. Group work becomes harder to sustain. Discussion loses its richness. Students who want to engage can feel inhibited by those around them. However, sustaining high expectations is essential, even when it feels difficult. The moment you lose heart, they lose heart.

The unequal recovery

Perhaps the most concerning aspect of Thomas’s findings is what happens next. Some students begin to re-engage — but this recovery is not evenly distributed. More advantaged pupils are more likely to regain enjoyment. Others remain disengaged, widening the gap in both attitude and, eventually, attainment.

Teachers recognise this pattern, even if they do not always name it explicitly. Some pupils find their way back through extracurricular activities or additional support. Others drift further away. For a long time, both teachers and students have responded to this by asking whether the curriculum is truly fit for purpose for all learners.

This tension sits at the heart of inclusive teaching. The goal is not universal passion, but universal opportunity.

Beyond “teenagers being teenagers”

A common explanation for declining motivation is adolescence itself. Hormones, identity, social pressures all play a role, but we should caution against using it as a catch-all explanation. Instead, perhaps there is a deeper mismatch between student needs and school structures.

As adolescents develop, they increasingly seek:

  • autonomy — choice and independence;
  • competence — a sense of progress and success;
  • belonging — connection and identity.

Yet, secondary schools can often drift in the opposite direction creating environments that are controlling, performance-focused which results in spoon-feeding and impersonal. Then we’re surprised when motivation drops.

This is not an indictment of individuals, but of systems. Teachers operate within demanding structures — large classes, heavy workloads, constant pressures. It is easy to fall into cycles of survival rather than reflection. But awareness is a starting point.

Rebuilding the spark

The motivation dip is not inevitable. Nor is it irreversible. If anything, the research and classroom reflections suggest that there is a crucial window — particularly towards the end of Year 7 where small, deliberate shifts can have lasting impact.

Some principles stand out:

  • Protect confidence early
    Notice the students who have gone quiet. Create opportunities where success feels visible and safe.
  • Guard the classroom culture
    Maintain high expectations for participation and collaboration, even when it is challenging.
  • Keep the subject ‘alive’
    Don’t strip out engaging activities simply because they are harder to manage.
  • Offer meaningful challenge
    As Thomas argues, the answer is not easier content, but richer experiences — problems that genuinely engage curiosity.

A profession worth backing

Ultimately, this is as much about teachers as it is about students. Sustaining engagement requires energy, reflection and, at times, resilience. Teaching is not a theoretical exercise. It is lived, complex, and often messy, but within that complexity lies opportunity. The patterns we see are not fixed; they are shaped by the environments we create. While no classroom is perfect, every classroom has the potential to shift the trajectory. The Year 7 dip may be predictable, but it is also preventable.

Want to know more? Check out our ‘At the chalk face’ episode on YouTube.

Related posts

Ofsted after the Big Listen: have the rules changed, or just the packaging?

Ofsted has changed its inspection framework, but many school leaders question whether it has changed the culture surrounding inspection. We explore whether report cards can rebuild trust, reduce pressure and create an accountability system that genuinely helps schools improve.

9 October 2026

Should I make my own resources?

Should teachers really be making all their own resources? We explore the balance between creating, buying and adapting resources — and why thoughtful planning matters more than who made them.

5 October 2026

How does age verification technology work?

Can technology really tell how old you are? Explore the computer science behind age verification and the privacy and accuracy questions it raises.

28 September 2026

UTF-8 is witchcraft, right?

Ever wondered how your computer can happily store a simple English letter, an emoji, a pound sign and characters from […]

22 September 2026

Why teaching models keep returning

Teaching frameworks can provide valuable guidance, but when they become rigid formulas, they can undermine professional judgement. The goal isn’t identical lessons – it’s consistently effective teaching.

18 September 2026

Do GCSEs doom students to fail?

GCSE results may look stubbornly flat, but the reality behind the numbers tells a very different story. Why has further improvement become so difficult, and are we measuring success in the right way?

11 September 2026

Will Quantum Computers Break Encryption?

Could quantum computers really break encryption and put our data at risk? We explore the reality behind the hype, from qubits and Shor’s Algorithm to the future of post-quantum security.

7 September 2026

Is AI a panacea?

AI is moving from experimentation to expectation in schools. But as adoption grows, the focus must shift from simply using AI to using it well. Discover how schools can balance workload, learning, safety and professional judgement — without losing the human element of great teaching.

4 September 2026

Digital ID cards: The future of work or a privacy nightmare?

Are digital ID cards the future of convenience or a threat to privacy? Explore the benefits, risks, and debate behind the UK’s proposed digital ID system.

31 August 2026

Back

The biggest curriculum shake-up in a decade – PART 2

What the CAR review means for teachers

21 November 2025

Welcome back to the next instalment of our deep-dive into the Curriculum and Assessment Review (CAR). Part one explored broad curriculum design and assessment reform; part two gets straight to the good stuff: What the upcoming changes actually mean for computing teachers.

This new review is a hefty read. Fortunately, this series breaks it all down so you don’t have to! Here’s what matters most for computing.

Computing time is shrinking – and that’s a problem

One of the standout concerns raised in the CAR is the reduction in curriculum time:

  • Key Stage 3 has dropped from 4% to 3%.
  • Key Stage 4 has dropped from 5% to 2%.

Schools increasingly push computing into carousels, shortened timetables, or — at Key Stage 4 — only offer it to GCSE Computer Science students. Shockingly, only 10% of schools surveyed teach computing to all KS4 students, despite it being a foundation subject.

The review makes it crystal clear: every pupil should study computing until age 16, just like PE, RS and citizenship.

GCSE Computer Science is being replaced

This news has caused quite a stir: the current GCSE Computer Science will be replaced by a broader, more balanced GCSE in Computing.

But why?

  • The existing qualification is “too narrow and specialised”.
  • Students score lower in Computer Science than in almost all other subjects.
  • The gender gap hasn’t improved despite years of initiatives.

The good news: the government has confirmed that core computer science principles — including programming and algorithms — will remain. They just won’t stand alone as a full qualification anymore.

Expect a GCSE that blends computer science, IT, digital literacy, real-world applications, and modern computing concepts.

Computing won’t sit alone anymore – subjects will intertwine

The new curriculum will be the most holistic version yet. Skills will overlap between subjects, and computing will act as an engine powering others, such as maths, DT, geography, and citizenship.

The programme of study will be machine-readable and interactive, showing explicit links across subjects. Think Google Earth in geography, algorithms discussed in English when analysing bias, or spreadsheet skills needed for financial literacy.

Digital literacy and AI: Now national priorities

Two major themes run across the whole review:

Digital literacy

Defined by the government as the knowledge, behaviours, and confidence needed to use technology safely and critically. This includes:

  • online safety
  • digital footprints
  • cyber security
  • fake news and bias
  • navigating modern interfaces
  • basic operational skills, many pupils no longer have

Schools must offer explicit digital education across all key stages.

AI literacy

AI will feature throughout the curriculum, but computing is its “home”. Students will learn:

  • how AI works
  • its limitations
  • ethical implications
  • how to use and question it

Given that students already use AI outside school, this is a long-overdue update.

So what next?

The CAR review sets the stage for the biggest shift in computing education in a decade. From a rebalanced curriculum to the arrival of a new GCSE, the coming years will reshape what — and how — we teach.

For now, the key message is simple: computing is becoming broader, more relevant, and more cross-curricular than ever before.

Download our Curriculum and Assessment Review summary HERE- Curriculum and Assessment Review Summary.

 

📺 Watch our breakdown here as we talk through the key findings in our signature chalk face style.


🌐 Explore more resources, guides and updates on the Craig’n’Dave website — your home for high-quality computing education support.

Related posts

Ofsted after the Big Listen: have the rules changed, or just the packaging?

Ofsted has changed its inspection framework, but many school leaders question whether it has changed the culture surrounding inspection. We explore whether report cards can rebuild trust, reduce pressure and create an accountability system that genuinely helps schools improve.

9 October 2026

Should I make my own resources?

Should teachers really be making all their own resources? We explore the balance between creating, buying and adapting resources — and why thoughtful planning matters more than who made them.

5 October 2026

How does age verification technology work?

Can technology really tell how old you are? Explore the computer science behind age verification and the privacy and accuracy questions it raises.

28 September 2026

UTF-8 is witchcraft, right?

Ever wondered how your computer can happily store a simple English letter, an emoji, a pound sign and characters from […]

22 September 2026

Why teaching models keep returning

Teaching frameworks can provide valuable guidance, but when they become rigid formulas, they can undermine professional judgement. The goal isn’t identical lessons – it’s consistently effective teaching.

18 September 2026

Do GCSEs doom students to fail?

GCSE results may look stubbornly flat, but the reality behind the numbers tells a very different story. Why has further improvement become so difficult, and are we measuring success in the right way?

11 September 2026

Will Quantum Computers Break Encryption?

Could quantum computers really break encryption and put our data at risk? We explore the reality behind the hype, from qubits and Shor’s Algorithm to the future of post-quantum security.

7 September 2026

Is AI a panacea?

AI is moving from experimentation to expectation in schools. But as adoption grows, the focus must shift from simply using AI to using it well. Discover how schools can balance workload, learning, safety and professional judgement — without losing the human element of great teaching.

4 September 2026

Digital ID cards: The future of work or a privacy nightmare?

Are digital ID cards the future of convenience or a threat to privacy? Explore the benefits, risks, and debate behind the UK’s proposed digital ID system.

31 August 2026

Back

High expectations from the first minute

7 November 2025

In Computing, every minute counts. Setting high expectations isn’t about demanding work or creating unnecessary pressure—it’s about clarity. It means knowing exactly what you want from your students and using simple, consistent techniques to achieve it. The most effective teachers don’t leave the first few minutes of a lesson to chance. They use this time purposefully to establish routines, reinforce learning, and create a calm, focused atmosphere where students know what to do and why it matters. Here’s how you can make the beginning of every lesson count.

1. Meet and greet: the power of the doorway

The moment students arrive is your first opportunity to assert calm authority. Greet students at the door with their name, a smile and a clear expectation for how they should enter the room. This bottleneck puts you in control. Don’t allow students to just pile into the room. An orderly entry sets the tone for the rest of the lesson. Don’t hesitate to stop students from entering if they are being disruptive—this reinforces that your classroom is a place of focus and respect.

Tip: Use positive reinforcement for students who enter appropriately and calmly redirect those who don’t to leave and enter again.

2. Engagement on entry: establishing a routine

Idle time is the enemy of learning. Students should know exactly what to do the moment they walk in. Whether you call it a starter, do-now activity, or engagement on entry, the key is consistency. This routine builds a culture of focus and reduces wasted time.

Tip: “What are we doing?” should never be a question in your classroom.

3. Combat the forgetting curve with recall activities

The start of the lesson is the perfect time for retrieval practice. A well-designed recall activity helps students strengthen their memory and make connections with prior learning. However, avoid tasks with a fixed end point—some students will finish early and become disengaged.

Tip: Provide more work than there is time to complete.

4. Why Smart Revise Quiz is the perfect solution

For GCSE and A-level students, Smart Revise Quiz is a powerful tool. Its dynamic, never-ending loop of low-stakes multiple-choice questions ensures that students are always engaged. The platform uses intelligent algorithms for spacing, interleaving, and personalisation, targeting each student’s weaker areas and adapting the question order accordingly.

Tip: With Smart Revise no student finishes early and no student is left behind.

5. Preparing for the lesson ahead

Alternatively, use the start of the lesson to prime students for what’s to come. At A-level, Craig’n’Dave micro-activities are excellent for this purpose. At GCSE, every lesson includes a starter that aligns with the learning objectives, helping students transition into the right mindset.

Tip: If you use Smart Revise, it is best to stick to the routine. You can also use starter activities at any point in the lesson as class discussions or plenaries instead.

6. Inclusive and accessible activity

The 2025 Ofsted framework places a stronger emphasis on inclusion and equity. This means ensuring that all students, including those with SEND or from disadvantaged backgrounds, can access and engage with the starter activity. That’s why a low-stakes, low-barrier to entry activity is better for the start of the lesson. Inspectors will be looking for how well teachers identify and reduce barriers to learning. It is important that inclusive practices are embedded in everyday routines.

Tip: Too much challenge too soon can turn off students before they even begin.

7. Why seven minutes matters

The duration of your starter activity sends a message. Five minutes can feel rushed and unimportant. Ten minutes may seem arbitrary. But seven minutes? It feels intentional. It’s long enough to be meaningful, short enough to maintain momentum.

Tip: Odd numbers feel deliberate. Use them to your advantage.

8. Transitioning into the lesson

Once the initial activity is complete, have a clear, recognisable signal to begin the main lesson. This could be a phrase, a countdown, or a visual cue. The goal is for students to respond quickly and without repeated prompting.

Consistency breeds compliance. Familiar cues reduce friction.

9. Use consistent language and positive signals

High expectations are not just about what you do—they’re also about what you say and how you say it. The language you use in the classroom communicates your belief in students’ potential and shapes the culture of learning. When you speak with clarity, purpose, and positivity, you signal to students that they are capable, that their time matters, and that learning is serious business. Use consistent, positive phrasing that reinforces routines and expectations. For example, instead of saying, “Stop messing around,” try, “Show me you’re ready to learn.” Non-verbal cues are equally powerful. A raised hand, a countdown, or a visual timer can become familiar signals that prompt immediate responses without the need for repeated instructions.

Tip: Play the long game. Over time, these cues become part of the classroom rhythm, reducing the need for correction and increasing student autonomy.

10. Eliminate distractions before you begin

Before students enter the room do a quick sweep. Clear up any loose pens, paper and rubbish. Ensure the computers are turned on and ready for a student to log on. If there are technical difficulties the engagement on entry activity gives everyone else something to be working on while you diagnose the problem. Before diving into new content, ensure you have every student’s full attention. Techniques include gathering students at the front of the room, using screen-locking software to prevent off-task behaviour and waiting silently until you have 100% focus.

Tip: Own the room before you teach. Never compete with distractions—don’t talk if a student is talking, wait for perfect silence.

Final thoughts: routines build culture

High expectations aren’t about being strict—they’re about being consistent. When students know what to expect and what’s expected of them, they feel secure and ready to learn. The start of the lesson is your opportunity to build that culture, every single time.

Related posts

Ofsted after the Big Listen: have the rules changed, or just the packaging?

Ofsted has changed its inspection framework, but many school leaders question whether it has changed the culture surrounding inspection. We explore whether report cards can rebuild trust, reduce pressure and create an accountability system that genuinely helps schools improve.

9 October 2026

Should I make my own resources?

Should teachers really be making all their own resources? We explore the balance between creating, buying and adapting resources — and why thoughtful planning matters more than who made them.

5 October 2026

How does age verification technology work?

Can technology really tell how old you are? Explore the computer science behind age verification and the privacy and accuracy questions it raises.

28 September 2026

UTF-8 is witchcraft, right?

Ever wondered how your computer can happily store a simple English letter, an emoji, a pound sign and characters from […]

22 September 2026

Why teaching models keep returning

Teaching frameworks can provide valuable guidance, but when they become rigid formulas, they can undermine professional judgement. The goal isn’t identical lessons – it’s consistently effective teaching.

18 September 2026

Do GCSEs doom students to fail?

GCSE results may look stubbornly flat, but the reality behind the numbers tells a very different story. Why has further improvement become so difficult, and are we measuring success in the right way?

11 September 2026

Will Quantum Computers Break Encryption?

Could quantum computers really break encryption and put our data at risk? We explore the reality behind the hype, from qubits and Shor’s Algorithm to the future of post-quantum security.

7 September 2026

Is AI a panacea?

AI is moving from experimentation to expectation in schools. But as adoption grows, the focus must shift from simply using AI to using it well. Discover how schools can balance workload, learning, safety and professional judgement — without losing the human element of great teaching.

4 September 2026

Digital ID cards: The future of work or a privacy nightmare?

Are digital ID cards the future of convenience or a threat to privacy? Explore the benefits, risks, and debate behind the UK’s proposed digital ID system.

31 August 2026

Back

A new year and another new initiative

1 September 2025

The concept of learning styles—the idea that individuals learn better when taught in their preferred sensory modality (e.g., visual, auditory, kinesthetic)—has been widely popular in education. However, despite its appeal, the theory has been largely debunked by empirical research. Here’s a breakdown of the origins, popularity, and scientific critique: 

 Origins and Popularity 

  • Early Theories: The idea of learning styles can be traced back to educational psychology in the 20th century. One of the most influential models was the VARK model (Visual, Auditory, Reading/Writing, Kinesthetic), developed by Neil Fleming in the 1990s. 
  • Appeal: It resonated with educators and learners because it emphasised personalisation and seemed intuitive—people often feel they have a preferred way of learning. 

Scientific Research and Debunking 

  • Key Issue: The central claim is that matching teaching styles to a student’s preferred learning style improves learning outcomes. This is known as the “meshing hypothesis.” 
  • Major Review: In 2008, a comprehensive review by Pashler et al. in Psychological Science in the Public Interest concluded that:  There is no adequate evidence base to justify incorporating learning styles assessments into general educational practice.” 

Findings

  • Studies that properly tested the meshing hypothesis (i.e., using randomised controlled trials and measuring actual learning outcomes) did not find support for it. 
  • People may have preferences, but teaching to those preferences does not improve learning. 
  • Content matters more: The best modality often depends on the subject matter (e.g., diagrams for geometry, audio for music), not the learner. 

What Actually Works 

  • Cognitive science supports strategies like: 
  • Spaced repetition 
  • Retrieval practice 
  • Interleaving (mixing different topics or skills) 
  • Dual coding (combining words and visuals) 
  • These methods are evidence-based and improve learning across the board, regardless of “style.” 

Why It Still Persists 

  • Confirmation bias: People remember when their preferred style seemed to help. 
  • Commercial interests: Many companies sell learning style assessments and training. 
  • Intuitive appeal: It feels personalised and empowering, even if it’s not effective. 

Want to know more? Watch the full video on our YouTube channel – At the chalk face.

For more educational news, check out the At the Chalk Face YouTube playlist HERE.

Visit our website to explore more cutting-edge tech-transforming news in the computer science world!

Related posts

Ofsted after the Big Listen: have the rules changed, or just the packaging?

Ofsted has changed its inspection framework, but many school leaders question whether it has changed the culture surrounding inspection. We explore whether report cards can rebuild trust, reduce pressure and create an accountability system that genuinely helps schools improve.

9 October 2026

Should I make my own resources?

Should teachers really be making all their own resources? We explore the balance between creating, buying and adapting resources — and why thoughtful planning matters more than who made them.

5 October 2026

How does age verification technology work?

Can technology really tell how old you are? Explore the computer science behind age verification and the privacy and accuracy questions it raises.

28 September 2026

UTF-8 is witchcraft, right?

Ever wondered how your computer can happily store a simple English letter, an emoji, a pound sign and characters from […]

22 September 2026

Why teaching models keep returning

Teaching frameworks can provide valuable guidance, but when they become rigid formulas, they can undermine professional judgement. The goal isn’t identical lessons – it’s consistently effective teaching.

18 September 2026

Do GCSEs doom students to fail?

GCSE results may look stubbornly flat, but the reality behind the numbers tells a very different story. Why has further improvement become so difficult, and are we measuring success in the right way?

11 September 2026

Will Quantum Computers Break Encryption?

Could quantum computers really break encryption and put our data at risk? We explore the reality behind the hype, from qubits and Shor’s Algorithm to the future of post-quantum security.

7 September 2026

Is AI a panacea?

AI is moving from experimentation to expectation in schools. But as adoption grows, the focus must shift from simply using AI to using it well. Discover how schools can balance workload, learning, safety and professional judgement — without losing the human element of great teaching.

4 September 2026

Digital ID cards: The future of work or a privacy nightmare?

Are digital ID cards the future of convenience or a threat to privacy? Explore the benefits, risks, and debate behind the UK’s proposed digital ID system.

31 August 2026

Back

What is AI?

AI: Just fast maths pretending to be smart

12 August 2025

AI. It’s a term that gets thrown around everywhere—from science fiction films to social media posts and school corridors. But what actually is artificial intelligence, and why is it so important to understand?

At its core, AI doesn’t actually think—it just predicts. It’s essentially super-fast maths, rapidly analysing patterns to guess what should come next in a sequence. Imagine that friend who always finishes your sentences… except AI does it with slightly better accuracy.

How do transformers power AI?

No, we’re not talking about giant robots (although that would be cool). In AI, transformers are a type of deep learning model that helps machines generate human-like text. Here’s how they do it:

  • Word magic: AI doesn’t see words—it sees numbers. It converts text into numerical values that represent meaning. Kind of like the Matrix, but without the leather trench coats.
  • Attention, please! Transformers scan every word in a sentence and decide which ones are important. It’s a bit like pretending to listen in a meeting but only perking up when you hear “free snacks.”
  • Prediction time: AI makes an educated guess about the next word, refines it, and repeats the process until the sentence sounds human. The result? AI-generated essays, jokes, and sometimes suspiciously accurate emails.

How does AI learn??

Behind the scenes, AI is powered by huge datasets and clever algorithms. These systems “learn” patterns from data, meaning they can improve their performance over time without being explicitly programmed to do so. This process is called machine learning, and it’s how many of today’s most exciting AI tools work.

AI and you

AI is already influencing your daily life, whether you realise it or not. It shapes the content you see online, helps doctors spot diseases faster, supports businesses with automation, and could even play a role in your future career. Understanding how it works is more than just useful—it’s essential.

Why AI isn’t taking over (yet)

Despite its clever tricks, AI isn’t sentient—it’s just playing a game of supercharged fill-in-the-blank. While it’s brilliant for generating text and answering questions, it still lacks genuine understanding or creativity. So, would you trust it to run the world? probably not. But to help you write a convincing email? absolutely.

Want to learn more?

Want to know more? Check out The Lesson Hacker’s YouTube video HERE.

For more Lesson Hacker Videos check out the CraignDave YouTube playlist HERE.

Visit our website to explore more cutting-edge tech-transforming news in the computer science world!

 

Related posts

Ofsted after the Big Listen: have the rules changed, or just the packaging?

Ofsted has changed its inspection framework, but many school leaders question whether it has changed the culture surrounding inspection. We explore whether report cards can rebuild trust, reduce pressure and create an accountability system that genuinely helps schools improve.

9 October 2026

Should I make my own resources?

Should teachers really be making all their own resources? We explore the balance between creating, buying and adapting resources — and why thoughtful planning matters more than who made them.

5 October 2026

How does age verification technology work?

Can technology really tell how old you are? Explore the computer science behind age verification and the privacy and accuracy questions it raises.

28 September 2026

UTF-8 is witchcraft, right?

Ever wondered how your computer can happily store a simple English letter, an emoji, a pound sign and characters from […]

22 September 2026

Why teaching models keep returning

Teaching frameworks can provide valuable guidance, but when they become rigid formulas, they can undermine professional judgement. The goal isn’t identical lessons – it’s consistently effective teaching.

18 September 2026

Do GCSEs doom students to fail?

GCSE results may look stubbornly flat, but the reality behind the numbers tells a very different story. Why has further improvement become so difficult, and are we measuring success in the right way?

11 September 2026

Will Quantum Computers Break Encryption?

Could quantum computers really break encryption and put our data at risk? We explore the reality behind the hype, from qubits and Shor’s Algorithm to the future of post-quantum security.

7 September 2026

Is AI a panacea?

AI is moving from experimentation to expectation in schools. But as adoption grows, the focus must shift from simply using AI to using it well. Discover how schools can balance workload, learning, safety and professional judgement — without losing the human element of great teaching.

4 September 2026

Digital ID cards: The future of work or a privacy nightmare?

Are digital ID cards the future of convenience or a threat to privacy? Explore the benefits, risks, and debate behind the UK’s proposed digital ID system.

31 August 2026

Back

Getting maximum value from Smart Revise with Year 11

15 April 2025

Exams are only a few months away and what your students do now is going to make the biggest impact to their results in August. It almost doesn’t matter what their work ethic has been like up until now, there is still time for all students to achieve their potential if they engage in regular active revision using the best techniques from today. 

Once you have delivered all the course content switch the topic filters to “Student controlled” in Smart Revise. Make sure you have Quiz, Terms reflective, Terms interactive and Advance modes enabled in the class settings. This will allow the students to take charge of what to revise, when and how. 

Top tips for students 

  • Use the Summary report to know the topics that are your strengths and weaknesses. 
  • Click on a Quiz pie chart in the summary report to do multiple-choice questions only on weaker topics. 
  • Look at the Top 10 revision references at the bottom of the summary report.
    These are your specific weaknesses across the whole course. You can watch the Craig’n’Dave videos if that helps but beware of passive revision. 
  • Click on a Terms pie chart in the summary report and filter the cards you want to focus on: sad, neutral, happy, unanswered. Reflective is a passive reflection. Interactive is more challenging but is essential. You should be able to define terms at this stage of the course. Use reflective as a reminder and interactive when you are revising. 
  • Click on an Advance pie chart in the summary report to see exam-style questions. Use the next button to find a question you want to attempt. Start with the low mark questions first and work up. Pretend you are in a real exam. Set an alarm on your phone for the number of marks the question is worth and spend that amount of time answering the question. 
  • Use the built-in mark schemes to mark your answer and be realistic. It doesn’t matter if you get low marks when you are practicing. 
  • If you don’t get full marks, note the question number. Have another go at the same question a few days later to see if you can improve your answer. Use the “last answer” button to see your most recent answer. 
  • Start with low mark questions, but don’t avoid the high mark Advance questions forever. You will get lots of 1–6-mark questions in your exam and one 8-mark question in each paper. 
  • Just because you know something this week doesn’t mean you will remember it next week so don’t neglect the topics you have mostly green on the pie charts in the summary report. Checking you still have the understanding is important. 
  • Start Terms – Leitner mode is good for daily reminders of terminology once you have mostly green or yellow pie charts in most of the topics on your summary report. Remember to set the topic filters to the whole course before using Leitner mode.
     

Beyond Smart Revise 

Although Smart Revise is great, it is important to provide students with real past papers so they can practice writing on lines with a pen too! Some papers will be publicly available on exam board websites, but others will require logging in to their portals to be downloaded. 

We often assume students will just “know” how to revise without being explicitly taught how to. This is a mistake. Show students the technique of mind mapping and build a mind map for a topic with them, maybe using the Terms in Smart Revise for reference. Smart Revise compliments this tried and tested approach, it does not replace it. 

One technique we developed with our students is the “what why web” (see what we did there) which is a scaffolded approach to making a mind map. Write the concept in the middle and then on a second branch state what words are associated with the concept, and on a third branch state why it is necessary, any implications and examples. 

For example, the concept of registers for OCR J277 might look like this: 

As Dunlosky showed, the worst revision students can do is reading their notes, looking over classwork and watching videos because these are passive techniques. Knowledge organisers and revision guides are useful, but they should only be used as a reference guide to check understanding, in themselves they are not revision.

By the way, put those highlighter pens away because research has shown that highlighting notes is worthless!

Related posts

Ofsted after the Big Listen: have the rules changed, or just the packaging?

Ofsted has changed its inspection framework, but many school leaders question whether it has changed the culture surrounding inspection. We explore whether report cards can rebuild trust, reduce pressure and create an accountability system that genuinely helps schools improve.

9 October 2026

Should I make my own resources?

Should teachers really be making all their own resources? We explore the balance between creating, buying and adapting resources — and why thoughtful planning matters more than who made them.

5 October 2026

How does age verification technology work?

Can technology really tell how old you are? Explore the computer science behind age verification and the privacy and accuracy questions it raises.

28 September 2026

UTF-8 is witchcraft, right?

Ever wondered how your computer can happily store a simple English letter, an emoji, a pound sign and characters from […]

22 September 2026

Why teaching models keep returning

Teaching frameworks can provide valuable guidance, but when they become rigid formulas, they can undermine professional judgement. The goal isn’t identical lessons – it’s consistently effective teaching.

18 September 2026

Do GCSEs doom students to fail?

GCSE results may look stubbornly flat, but the reality behind the numbers tells a very different story. Why has further improvement become so difficult, and are we measuring success in the right way?

11 September 2026

Will Quantum Computers Break Encryption?

Could quantum computers really break encryption and put our data at risk? We explore the reality behind the hype, from qubits and Shor’s Algorithm to the future of post-quantum security.

7 September 2026

Is AI a panacea?

AI is moving from experimentation to expectation in schools. But as adoption grows, the focus must shift from simply using AI to using it well. Discover how schools can balance workload, learning, safety and professional judgement — without losing the human element of great teaching.

4 September 2026

Digital ID cards: The future of work or a privacy nightmare?

Are digital ID cards the future of convenience or a threat to privacy? Explore the benefits, risks, and debate behind the UK’s proposed digital ID system.

31 August 2026